Hi @kushion,
The BlueROV1 design is from well before my time at BR, but your idea sounds pretty convincing to me ![]()
I’ll ask internally in case there’s something we’re both missing.
There’s some relevant discussion here ![]()
Both approaches are functionally equivalent. The BlueROV1 approach means you don’t need to build a custom firmware, but if you want to set up custom / more optimised thruster contribution factors for your vehicle then there’s no reason for you to define an extra motor that doesn’t actually get used (unless you think you might use it at some point).