The DIY AUV Ålen ("The eel")

Build DIY AUVs
1

Hi everyone!

My two friends Adam, David and I decided five years ago that building an AUV would be a cool hobby project. The goal was to autonomously, and under water (mostly), circumnavigate a small islet about 600 meters offshore.

Fast forward five years and here it is. Ålen. Or “The Eel” in English.

20250316_162614_crop
20250316_162614_crop2372×725 419 KB

Last month, to our great joy, we successfully completed the mission. Friends and families were there to cheer us on, and we had a big TV set up that showed some telemetry during the run.

Low cost DIY AUVs still is quite a niche thing. And people use all kinds of interesting sensors and techniques to move around, steer, navigate, dive and observe the world around them. And they use them for all sort of different applications, or no applications at all. Maybe just to prove to themselft that the thing sort of works as intended, like we did :slight_smile:

For that reason I thought it maybe could be of interest to share some design ideas that we went with. There are quite a lot of sub systems (pun intended) on our AUV so I’ll try and keep it brief and separate it in different posts.

Propulsion and maneuvering

Here we let our mechanical mind go a bit wild before coming up with this idea. We thought it would be cool if we could combine pitch and yaw motion with only one control rod.

So, there is a cheap but powerful enough geared brushed motor in the dry WTC with a shaft going through the endcap and a small radial seal. Then a universal joint connects the shaft to the propeller. The universal joint in turn is coupled with a linkage and a gear that basically connects to the control rod. When the control rod is moved in/out this steers the propeller in yaw. And when the control rod rotates, it controls pitch.Two servos, one on top of the other does the moving and rotating.

We have since refined the servo setup and made it more rigid, but the basic principle remains.

To prevent the torque from the motor to roll the AUV, we use a long 10x10mm stainless steel bar to act as a keel. Also, the fixed fins on the back of the AUV are angled slightly to counteract the roll when at some speed. Max speed at the moment is 1 m/s.

IMG_9257
IMG_92571920×1440 244 KB

Pros:

  • Works surprisingly well to thrust vector the propeller and gives great maneuverability
  • One less control rod to penetrate the hull which is always a good thing.

Cons:

  • Having control rods and shafts at all penetrating the WTC is always risky if not done properly
  • The mechanism and the universal joint itself needs to be made more rugged or encapsulated in some way to protect it from debris and the hard environment of the ocean.

If you found this interesting, my next post will be about our novel dual ballast tank/pump solution. And then our emergency rescue buoy.

More info can also be found on https://www.foxpoint.se/

Cheers!

10 Likes
2

This is super interesting! I love that steering mechanism! Please keep posting. I’m very curious to see how you designed the rest of the systems.

Thanks for sharing!

2 Likes
3

Emergency rescue buoy

20250316_162614_buoy
20250316_162614_buoy2104×725 380 KB

Ok, so going completely untethered for the first time was a big thing for us. For the first three years we had a 20m long slim ethernet tether bundled together with some foam string to make it buoyant. Pretty crude but we were too cheap for a proper setup since this was only a temporary solution. This took care of communications to and from Ålen, as well as the ever so often fails that happen where you instead need to use the tether as a safety line. Equally as important I would say.

The fourth year we had installed a 4G modem so we could send commands when on the surface. But then we didn’t have anything to pull on when things went bad, so we hooked on a fishing rod with 300 meters of 40kg line as a backup. This worked to some degree, but we tangled the line in the propeller several times, even burning the motors twice. It was not a great solution and we were not going to navigate around this islet with strings attached, that was for sure. We needed to come up with another solution.

So we made an entire document about potential failure modes and scenarios and pros and cons for different solutions. It will be too long to cover everything.

But basically we saw two options. Drop weights or emergency buoy. The reason why we opted for the buoy was mainly due to the fact that we wanted to be able to test the AUV in the spring without immediate access to a boat. And ofcourse the relatively shallow waters.

Our thinking was that if there is a catastrophic failure and the AUV sinks to the bottom, there are two scenarios: (completely lacking nuances and very roughly stated, but anyways…)

  1. The AUV drops its weights and slowly comes up to the surface. All electronics are now wet, function is unclear, but at least the AUV floats around on the surface, bobbing around in the direction of the wind. But we got no boat to pick it up.

  2. The AUV triggers a mechanism that ejects the self-contained buoy. The buoy, carrying a spool of fishing line, floats up to the surface. Lights start blinking, GNSS data is received and relayed via radio back to shore. The AUV is now acting as an ancor on the sea floor, physically connected via a line to the buoy on the surface. We note the location, make some phone calls and try to get someone with a boat out to the buoy the following day for a recovery.

As I said, there are so many nuances to this, safeguards that can be designed if using one or the other system, other scenarios ect. But ultimately, this is what we went with.

Again, we (or I, since I’m the hardware guy of the bunch) got to design some fun mechanisms. The release mechanism is based on the mechanism used for quick releases. It’s essentially an “over center mechanism” that needs very little force to trigger a larger load.

This was necessary since we wanted to use a magnet attached to a servo inside the buoy’s WTC to trigger the release and eject mechanism attached to Ålen.

Inside the emergency buoy is an arduino MKRWAN1310 with a LoRa module for communication, a GNSS receiver, a servo, a battery and some LEDs. It is set to trigger if the GNSS receiver doesn’t get a satellite fix in 5 minutes. For this reason, during the run around the island, our longest dive was just under 2 minutes.

The range of the LoRa communication was tested to at least 1 km with the buoy floating really low in the water and in line of sight to the receiver. This was going to be good enough for us.

Here is another video of testing the system. We did do successful tests down to 20 meters which would be around the max depth of the island run. The spool was loaded with 30 meters of line.

In the future, I hope to get into electronics some more, because it’s so much fun. The buoy won’t be separate modules connected by wires then, but instead integrated on a circuit board. This way the buoy can be made sooo much smaller. Now it’s more like the space shuttle piggyback on a 747 :slight_smile:

Cheers!

2 Likes