# USBL Hardware Options

**URL:** <https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/t/usbl-hardware-options/19482>\
**Category:** Sonar and Acoustics\
**Tags:** positioning\
**Created:** [February 22, 2025, 9:26am UTC](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/t/usbl-hardware-options/19482 "2025-02-22T09:26:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![3dMB](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discuss.bluerobotics.com/3dmb/32/13905_2.png) [@3dMB](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/u/3dMB)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2025, 9:26am UTC](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/t/usbl-hardware-options/19482/1 "2025-02-22T09:26:47Z")

</div>

I am now looking at buying a USBL for my BR2. I have done a forum search and see that all previous USBL recommendation posts are many years old and no doubt technology has moved along a fair bit since then.  
I am looking for a USBL unit, I already have a Cerulean Tracker650, so the Cerulean ROV Locators would be the obvious units to look at first, however is there something out there that would suit my needs more?  
I am looking for a unit to be used primarily from concrete or rock quaysides, however some occasional boat use.  
I would like a unit that will compliment the Tracker 650 and not argue with it.  
I would like to be able to have a unit where the topside software will store a file (CSV or similar) with Time & location data.  
I am not looking for survey grade, high accuracy is not so important but high precision would be nice.

What are peoples thoughts, please?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tony-white](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discuss.bluerobotics.com/tony-white/32/18385_2.png) [@tony-white](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/u/tony-white)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2025, 6:05pm UTC](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/t/usbl-hardware-options/19482/2 "2025-02-22T18:05:37Z")

</div>

Hi @3dMB -  
The ROVL Mk2 compliments the Tracker650 quite well - if you’re ok with Windows only software (that is a bit of a pain to use) you can fuse the DVL and ROVL position estimates and send them to the vehicle from the Cerulean Tracker software - make sure you install the latest version!

The topside does’t store the file you’re looking for, but a standard .BIN log (found under Autopilot logs, taken for as long as vehicle is armed) has all the information you need, and can easily be reviewed with this [tool](https://plot.ardupilot.org/). Exporting the data from there is possible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![3dMB](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discuss.bluerobotics.com/3dmb/32/13905_2.png) [@3dMB](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/u/3dMB)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2025, 8:14pm UTC](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/t/usbl-hardware-options/19482/3 "2025-02-22T20:14:47Z")

</div>

It is interning that you say the mk2 as opposed ot the mk3 - is this due to what you have experience with or is there something that the mk2 does better than the mk3?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tony-white](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discuss.bluerobotics.com/tony-white/32/18385_2.png) [@tony-white](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/u/tony-white)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2025, 3:07pm UTC](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/t/usbl-hardware-options/19482/4 "2025-02-23T15:07:13Z")

</div>

Hi @3dMB -  
I’ve only tested with the Mk2 - it is cheaper, and a bit less accurate - this would seem to fit your goals of

> I am not looking for survey grade, high accuracy is not so important but high precision would be nice.

Either unit would work great with your Tracker 650!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Almostafish](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/59ef9b/32.png) [@Almostafish](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/u/Almostafish)\
**Post date:** [July 28, 2025, 6:01pm UTC](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/t/usbl-hardware-options/19482/5 "2025-07-28T18:01:48Z")

</div>

Hi

I have a bluerov2 with the tracker 650 and the MK2 rovl unit. It works well but I do have issues with getting the rovl to accept an external GPS feed.

Other than that you get a nice amount of information on your ROV location.
