# Leaky penetrator on factory potted T200 thruster cable **URL:** \ **Category:** Thrusters and Motors\ **Created:** [October 25, 2021, 12:35pm UTC](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/t/leaky-penetrator-on-factory-potted-t200-thruster-cable/10891 "2021-10-25T12:35:06Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![EliotBR](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex019/user_avatar/discuss.bluerobotics.com/eliotbr/32/6937_2.png) [@EliotBR](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/u/EliotBR)\ **Post date:** [October 25, 2021, 10:20pm UTC](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/t/leaky-penetrator-on-factory-potted-t200-thruster-cable/10891/2 "2021-10-25T22:20:30Z")
Hi @magnusmyklebost, Sorry to hear you’ve had leaking penetrator issues. > [@magnusmyklebost](#): > > Has anyone experienced leaks on their factory mounted penetrators to the T200 thruster? It’s a known problem, and is discussed at length [here](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/t/multiple-cable-penetrator-leaks-design-flaw-video/7312). Reliability issues with potted penetrators (especially once we started potting them at scale) was a big part of why we put a heap of development effort into our new epoxy-less [WetLink range](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/t/introducing-wetlink-and-the-wetlink-penetrator/9861). You’ll find that most of our products no longer use potted penetrators, and those that still do are on the way to having them replaced with WetLinks. I’d recommend you contact [support@bluerobotics.com](mailto:support@bluerobotics.com) to discuss further, with respect to a potential replacement or refund. It would be helpful if you could link to this post, and also include an order number/date if you can 🙂 --- _[View the full topic](https://discuss.bluerobotics.com/t/leaky-penetrator-on-factory-potted-t200-thruster-cable/10891)._